DAS-BAHN-FORUM.de

’n Ahmdchen,

after a long time, I’ve uploaded a new, “full” version (no. 41). It contains a new stabling yard for the high-speed trains west of Clydeshire Airport station, which is decorated with a prototype for an ICE-G (goods) for high-speed goods trains along the high-speed line. Also sketched is a goods bypass line for Torkham and parts of a new container terminal for that area, and the renewed logfile was uploaded as well.

Hello,

Thanks for the update. Would you be able to upload an updated sc-english.nfz to the drive? I get the following error:

Affected trains are mostly high speed trains in the airport, but also two IR20 trains.

:-O
But difficult to do so now, from the other end of the country. All I can do is to wonder which trains of IR20 might be affected and how.

I did attach all user graphics files to the NT3 file. Can you delete all sc-english... files from the directory with the network file and load it again?

It's the same error that has bugged me for ages now, it's nothing new

I did what you asked, and now it complains about "Vehicle set number = 8" instead, everything else is the same

If you do this often enough, it might work its way forward to vehicle set number = ‐1. I'll be back home this evening, so I'm going to fix this.

’n Evening,
I’ve repackaged the sc-english.fz2 and sc-english.fz4 files and uploaded them to the Google Drive into the “User-defined graphics for the layout” folder. If you delete all files starting with “sc-english…” and place the three new files there, it should work.

You are right! It's at 0 now



This time it's all the auto train cars that are affected in addition to some other wagons. The amount 244 probably refers to the double decker coaches you've repainted. Routes affected in order are:

Looks like I smashed everything this time … :-\ Are you loading the NT3 file with all user files attached? Maybe some weird black magic caused by cross-pollination between different files? Well, I’ll see to it when I’m next.

Quick question, can I expect a new version from you before tomorrow?

Mooorning,

1993matias hat geschrieben: ↑Dienstag 19. November 2024, 10:12Quick question, can I expect a new version from you before tomorrow?

I was expecting a version from you on Saturday and got nothing, so I thought you were working through the weekend.

But if you didn’t do anything, I can offer a version I was secretly preparing to copy it in at a later date. It should now be available on the Drive.

It contains two hourly container block train routes Torkham – border at Farris, one of them will be extended to Clydesgow at a later date. Both form a nice half-hour interval, are moving from the goods bypass onto the mainline directly after the IC and manage to reach Farris shortly before the next IC is catching up.⁠ This should be sufficient to keep your container terminals busy for some time. Another route every two hours (with no additional direct service from Clydesgow) will follow in the footsteps of the IR to Bordele.

If you would like to reduce frequency at night and/or during passenger rush hours or want more or fewer trains, just say so!

We’ll see if I get a marshalling yard up and running within a decade.

Sascha Claus hat geschrieben: ↑Mittwoch 20. November 2024, 10:27 Mooorning,

1993matias hat geschrieben: ↑Dienstag 19. November 2024, 10:12Quick question, can I expect a new version from you before tomorrow?

I was expecting a version from you on Saturday and got nothing, so I thought you were working through the weekend.

But if you didn’t do anything, I can offer a version I was secretly preparing to copy it in at a later date. It should now be available on the Drive.

There was not enough progress to provide a finished and error-free new version, so I simply kept at it for a little bit. The weekend was busy anyway, so no worries about you building. I'll take your version and paste in my changes.

Sascha Claus hat geschrieben: ↑Mittwoch 20. November 2024, 10:27It contains two hourly container block train routes Torkham – border at Farris, one of them will be extended to Clydesgow at a later date. Both form a nice half-hour interval, are moving from the goods bypass onto the mainline directly after the IC and manage to reach Farris shortly before the next IC is catching up.⁠ This should be sufficient to keep your container terminals busy for some time. Another route every two hours (with no additional direct service from Clydesgow) will follow in the footsteps of the IR to Bordele.

If you would like to reduce frequency at night and/or during passenger rush hours or want more or fewer trains, just say so!

We’ll see if I get a marshalling yard up and running within a decade.

Great! I'll try to see if I can get the container trains all the way to the container terminal/port. Thanks!